Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Daniel Milavsky vs Ezekiel Clark Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Milavsky vs Clark analysis and find out who is favored!
Daniel Milavsky vs Ezekiel Clark Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Milavsky 1 - 0 Clark
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Milavsky has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Clark has won 49.48%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Milavsky, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Clark has won 55.12%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 31.38% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Milavsky has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Clark has saved 58.19% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Milavsky has won 63.64% of matches played (W/L 7/ 4), with Clark winning 47.37% (W/L 27/ 30) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Milavsky has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 8/ 5), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Clark has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 58% (W/L 138/ 98), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 39% (W/L 19/ 30).
- Player level: In the last year, Milavsky has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 63.64% of matches (W/L 7/ 4), where as Clark has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 58.54% of matches (W/L 24/ 17). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Milavsky winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Milavsky winning 2 and Clark winning 0. The last match between Milavsky and Clark was at the M25 Edwardsville, 26-07-2023, First, Hard with Daniel Milavsky getting the victory 7-5 7-6(3).
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:8:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Milavsky and Clark have played a deciding set 0 times, with Milavsky winning 0 times and Clark 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Milavsky winning 1, and Clark 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Milavsky has played against opponents with an average rank of 67.55 while Clark has played against players with an average rank of 120.98.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Milavsky has won 33% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Clark has won 57% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Milavsky has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Clark has converted 47.22% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
N/A
Rank
High
22
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
699
Rank
469
High
25
Age
R
Plays
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
Form
L
L
W
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
53% (8-7)
Career Total W/L
55% (167-137)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
48% (13-14)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Daniel Milavsky | Ezekiel Clark |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 14 | 11 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 8 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:8:0 | 2:8:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (54/92) | 77% (58/75) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 59% (32/54) | 62% (36/58) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 63% (24/38) | 41% (7/17) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 57% (4/7) | 38% (3/8) |
| Return Points W% | 43% (32/75) | 39% (36/92) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 7-6(3) |
Stats 
Daniel Milavsky
Player
Ezekiel Clark
59%
(
54 of
92)
1st Serve %
77%
(
58 of
75)
3
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
2
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
36 of
58)
63%
(
24 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
39%
(
36 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
75)
88
Total Points Won
79
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Daniel Milavsky | Ezekiel Clark |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 48% (13/14) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (33/33) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 52% (316/295) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 52% (12/11) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 25% (1/3) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.1 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 30 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.24 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 72 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 2:6:23 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 145.85 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 68% (1251/1831) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 65% (814/1251) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 49% (287/580) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 47% (85/180) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 41% (736/1806) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 25% (2/6) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 58% (11/8) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 48% (13/27) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 14% (1/7) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 42% (5/12) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 77% (13/10) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 23% (13/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 21% (14/3) |
Daniel Milavsky Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 | w/o | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Kareem Allaf
Player
Daniel Milavsky
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve %
48%
(
26 of
54)
6
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
18 of
26)
73%
(
16 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
68%
(
19 of
28)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
14 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
17 of
54)
59
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Milavsky
Player
Ezekiel Clark
59%
(
54 of
92)
1st Serve %
77%
(
58 of
75)
3
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
2
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
36 of
58)
63%
(
24 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
39%
(
36 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
75)
88
Total Points Won
79
|
7-5 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Milavsky
Player
J Mercer
59%
(
44 of
75)
1st Serve %
60%
(
39 of
65)
4
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
6
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
44%
(
33 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
28 of
65)
70
Total Points Won
63
|
4-6 6-4 10-8 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Benjamin Thomas George
Player
Daniel Milavsky
59%
(
48 of
82)
1st Serve %
55%
(
56 of
102)
1
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
8
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
39 of
56)
59%
(
20 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
16 of
46)
28%
(
5 of
18)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
39%
(
32 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
47 of
102)
97
Total Points Won
87
|
4-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Milavsky
Player
Igor Danich
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve %
53%
(
24 of
45)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
8 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
54
Total Points Won
25
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Milavsky
Player
William Bartram
41%
(
20 of
49)
1st Serve %
40%
(
24 of
60)
6
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
5
85%
(
17 of
20)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
30 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Murphy Cassone
Player
Daniel Milavsky
58%
(
65 of
113)
1st Serve %
60%
(
56 of
94)
4
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
8
62%
(
40 of
65)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
33 of
56)
50%
(
24 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
43%
(
49 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
46 of
94)
110
Total Points Won
97
|
7-5 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Ezekiel Clark Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Aryan Shah
Player
Ezekiel Clark
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve %
74%
(
45 of
61)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
19 of
45)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
38%
(
22 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
34 of
61)
70
Total Points Won
49
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ezekiel Clark
Player
Dan Martin
80%
(
71 of
89)
1st Serve %
57%
(
46 of
81)
0
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
68%
(
48 of
71)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
33%
(
29 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
28 of
81)
88
Total Points Won
82
|
6-2 3-6 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ezekiel Clark
Player
Jody Maginley
51%
(
19 of
37)
1st Serve %
49%
(
27 of
55)
0
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
10
89%
(
17 of
19)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
6 of
28)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
11 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
59
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ezekiel Clark
Player
Enmanuel Munoz
59%
(
36 of
61)
1st Serve %
48%
(
25 of
52)
0
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
9
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
6 of
27)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
41%
(
25 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
67
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Osgar O'Hoisin
Player
Ezekiel Clark
61%
(
52 of
85)
1st Serve %
73%
(
83 of
113)
13
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
8
77%
(
40 of
52)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
58 of
83)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
28 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
42 of
113)
99
Total Points Won
99
|
7-6(3) 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-3 0-6 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R2 | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Ezekiel Clark
Player
Ivan Marrero Curbelo
65%
(
77 of
118)
1st Serve %
56%
(
58 of
104)
2
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
8
61%
(
47 of
77)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
33 of
58)
49%
(
20 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
35%
(
7 of
20)
Break Points Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
43%
(
51 of
118)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
49 of
104)
116
Total Points Won
106
|
6-7(5) 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Dominik Palan
Player
Ezekiel Clark
56%
(
54 of
96)
1st Serve %
59%
(
64 of
108)
16
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
8
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
43 of
64)
45%
(
19 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
17 of
44)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
41%
(
39 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
48 of
108)
105
Total Points Won
99
|
5-7 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Matthew Christopher Romios
Player
Ezekiel Clark
74%
(
53 of
72)
1st Serve %
71%
(
57 of
80)
24
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
7
85%
(
45 of
53)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
43 of
57)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
18 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
27 of
80)
81
Total Points Won
71
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Milavsky Vs Clark Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
